Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy of single-port and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
The operation time of the single-hole group was significantly longer than that of the four-hole group [(42.48±6.66) min Vs (32.18±7.08) min], and the indwelling rate of abdominal drainage tube in the single-hole group was significantly lower than that in the four-hole group (1.67% Vs 21.67%), the differences were all There was statistical significance (P<0.05); the hospitalization time of the single-hole group was shorter than that of the four-hole group [(2.22±0.65) days vs (2.71±0.57) days], and the hospitalization cost of the single-hole group was higher than that of the four-hole group [(2.19 ±0.17) 10,000 yuan Vs (1.81±0.14) 10,000 yuan], the use rate of analgesics in the single-hole group at 24 hours after surgery was lower than that in the four-hole group (4.17% Vs 16.67%), and the postoperative satisfaction score of the single-hole group was higher than that of the four-hole group. The hole group was higher [(4.68±0.64) points Vs (4.47±0.68) points], and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no difference between the four-hole groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: The postoperative pain of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is light, the recovery is quick, and the surgical safety is not significantly different from that of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. At the same time, the satisfaction of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is higher. Clinical promotion
